Porter v. Pfizer Inc
Plaintiff: Dorothy Porter
Defendant: Pfizer Inc
Case Number: 2:2014cv01026
Filed: March 19, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: XUS, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MDL CONDITIONAL TRANSFERRING ORDER (CTO-7) TO THE USDC FOR THE DISTRICT OF CAROLINA (MDL 2502). Signed by Jeffrey N. Luthi for the MDL Panel on 3/19/14. (ysS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2014) [Transferred from California Northern on 3/20/2014.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Porter v. Pfizer Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dorothy Porter
Represented By: Suzanne Heald Kaplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pfizer Inc
Represented By: Amanda S Kitts
Represented By: Karin A. Kramer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?