Reeves v. Craddock
Plaintiff: Ashley Reeves
Defendant: John Craddock
Case Number: 2:2014cv01918
Filed: May 14, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Colleton
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting 12 Motion to Appoint Conservator Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 3/3/15.(elim, )
March 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER APPOINTING CONSERVATOR Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 2/26/15. (elim, ) Modified on 3/2/2015 to correct date signed (jbry, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reeves v. Craddock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Reeves
Represented By: W Mullins McLeod, Jr
Represented By: James Bernice Moore, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Craddock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?