Plummer v. Riley et al
| Andrew Plummer |
| Tim Riley, Ms Powe and DHO Glidewell |
| 2:2015cv00016 |
| January 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Charleston Office |
| Spartanburg |
| Mary Gordon Baker |
| Terry L Wooten |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
ORDER accepting 110 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker; granting 76 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 77 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 105 Motion for Reconsideration. This case is dismissed. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 6/1/2017.(ssam, )
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER accepting in part 92 Report and Recommendation; finding as moot 95 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court RECOMMITS the Report to the Magistrate Judge only as to this question for preparation of a supplemental report regarding loss of the 60 days good time credit. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 3/9/2017.(ssam, )
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER RULING ON 63 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 29 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Andrew Plummer. The Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and denies Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 3/2/16. (hhil, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
