Demos v. United States of America et al
| John R Demos |
| United States of America, CIA, The, FBI, The and President of the USA, The |
| 2:2015cv02360 |
| June 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Charleston Office |
| York |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Mandamus and Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER adopting 12 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker; denying 8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED without prejudice and without requiring Respondents to file an answer or other response. It is further ordered that for future non-habeas civil actions filed by Petitioner in this court, Petitioner's order of pre-filing review, Demos, 8:03-cv-0382, ECF No. 5, is modified as follows: 1. The Clerk of Court is authorized to assign civil action numbers (for docket control purposes) and to authorize the assigned magistrate judge to direct Petitioner to pay the statutory filing fee and any administrative fee imposed by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts; 2. Should Petitioner fail to pay the full statutory filing fee in any such applicable civil actions, such actions shall be dismissed without prejudice and without issuance of service of process. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 8/4/2015.(ssam, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
