Tinsley v. South Carolina, State of
Petitioner: James Tinsley
Respondent: South Carolina, State of
Case Number: 2:2015cv02744
Filed: July 10, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Oconee
Presiding Judge: Mary Gordon Baker
Presiding Judge: Sol Blatt
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER adopting 10 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker. The Petitioner's objections (Entry 12 ) are overruled; and this petition is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process for failure to exhaust state court remedies. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy for Honorable Sol Blatt, Jr on 4/18/2016.(ssam, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tinsley v. South Carolina, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Tinsley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: South Carolina, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?