Butler v. Pennington et al
| Beattie I Butler |
| D Ashley Pennington and Charleston County |
| 2:2015cv04455 |
| November 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Charleston Office |
| Charleston |
| Patrick Michael Duffy |
| Bristow Marchant |
| Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
158
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION denying 110 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by D Ashley Pennington, granting in part denying in part 111 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by D Ashley Pennington, Charleston County, and adopting 151 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 4/16/19. (alew, )
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER RULING ON 47 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, 44 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, filed by Beattie I Butler. It is ordered that plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendant Pennington's counterclai m with regard to the claim for defamation based on plaintiff publically claiming defendant terminated him because he has cancer is granted, and in all other respects plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendant Pennington's counterclaim for defamation and slander per se is denied. It is ordered, that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted as the order of this Court. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 12/27/2016. (egra, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
