Leaphart v. Eagleton

Leaphart v. Eagleton

Petitioner:	Kareem Jabbar Leaphart
Respondent:	Willie L Eagleton
Case Number:	2:2015cv04910
Filed:	December 10, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	Lexington
Presiding Judge:	Mary Gordon Baker
Presiding Judge:	J Michelle Childs
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 28, 2018	Filing 43 ORDER AND OPINION accepting 37 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker; granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 3/28/2018.(ssam, ) (Main Document 43 replaced on 3/28/2018) (asni, ).
March 29, 2017	Filing 28 ORDER AND OPINION accepting in part and rejecting in part 21 Report and Recommendation; granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion for Summary Judgment. Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 9 ) is GRANTED IN PART with respect to Grounds One and Three through Five and with respect to the third, fourth, and fifth reasons supporting Ground Two and DENIED IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE with respect to the first and second reasons supporting Ground T wo. Grounds One and Three through Five and the third, fourth, and fifth reasons supporting Ground Two (ECF No. 1 ) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This matter is RECOMMITTED to the Magistrate Judge for consideration of any further motions and briefings in accordance with this order. In this case, the legal standard for the issuance of a certificate of appealability has not been met. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 3/29/2017.(ssam, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 28, 2018

Filing 43 ORDER AND OPINION accepting 37 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker; granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 3/28/2018.(ssam, ) (Main Document 43 replaced on 3/28/2018) (asni, ).

March 29, 2017

Filing 28 ORDER AND OPINION accepting in part and rejecting in part 21 Report and Recommendation; granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion for Summary Judgment. Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 9 ) is GRANTED IN PART with respect to Grounds One and Three through Five and with respect to the third, fourth, and fifth reasons supporting Ground Two and DENIED IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE with respect to the first and second reasons supporting Ground T wo. Grounds One and Three through Five and the third, fourth, and fifth reasons supporting Ground Two (ECF No. 1 ) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This matter is RECOMMITTED to the Magistrate Judge for consideration of any further motions and briefings in accordance with this order. In this case, the legal standard for the issuance of a certificate of appealability has not been met. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 3/29/2017.(ssam, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Leaphart v. Eagleton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Kareem Jabbar Leaphart
Represented By:	Tara D Shurling
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Willie L Eagleton
Represented By:	Donald John Zelenka
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?