Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC et al v. Marceda
Petitioner: Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings LLC
Respondent: Michael Rocco Marceda
Case Number: 2:2016cv01743
Filed: May 31, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: XUS, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 9 U.S.C. ยง 9
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC et al v. Marceda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC
Represented By: Robert Alan Bernstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings LLC
Represented By: Robert Alan Bernstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Rocco Marceda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?