Lockett v. Warden FCI Estill SC
Petitioner: Gary Lockett
Respondent: Warden FCI Estill SC
Case Number: 2:2016cv02439
Filed: July 5, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Hampton
Presiding Judge: Mary Gordon Baker
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Anderson
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER adopting 11 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker. The Court summarily dismisses Petitioner's case without prejudice, and without requiring Respondent to file a return. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 2/13/2017.(ssam, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lockett v. Warden FCI Estill SC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gary Lockett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden FCI Estill SC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?