Bennett v. United States
Plaintiff: Edward Bennett
Defendant: United States
Case Number: 2:2016cv02645
Filed: July 26, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Charleston
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:2674
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER AND OPINION granting 15 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 5/15/2017.(sshe, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bennett v. United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward Bennett
Represented By: Benjamin Alexander Traywick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States
Represented By: Terri Hearn Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?