Voeltz v. Bridge Charleston Investments E LLC et al
| Corinne Voeltz |
| Bridge Charleston Investments E LLC and Luxury Simplified LLC |
| 2:2016cv02971 |
| August 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Charleston Office |
| Charleston |
| Patrick Michael Duffy |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
250
ORDER AND OPINION The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion (Dkt. 158 ) and James W. Coaker is excluded from testifying as an expert witness at trial. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 4/12/2019.(sshe, )
|
|
Filing
248
ORDER AND OPINION The Court DENIES Defendants' motion to bifurcate. (Dkt. 213 .) AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 4/11/2019.(sshe, )
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER AND OPINION granting in part and denying in part 148 Defendant Elevator Services of Charleston Inc's Motion for Summary Judgment. Elevator Services of Charleston, Inc.'s Motion is GRANTED as to the cause of action for strict liability. Elevator Services of Charleston, Inc.'s Motion is DENIED as to all other claims. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 2/26/2019.(sshe, )
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING 94 Defendant Folly's Best Rentals Inc and Folly's Best Inc's Motion for Summary Judgment. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 9/26/2018.(sshe, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
