Song Chuan Technology Co Ltd v. Bank of America NA et al
Song Chuan Technology Co Ltd |
Bank of America NA and John Doe |
2:2016cv03269 |
September 30, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Charleston Office |
XXOutside US |
Richard M Gergel |
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 ORDER AND OPINION granting in part and denying in part 32 Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend. The Court's order of March 10, 2017 (Dkt. No. 30) is altered to deny Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the c omplaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff's ability to file a complaint asserting a constructive trust claim against Bank of America alleging failure to return funds transferred from Song Chuan to a Bank of America account holder under a transfer order effectively cancelled under § S.C. Code 36-4A-211. The motion is otherwise DENIED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 5/8/2017.(sshe, ) |
Filing 30 ORDER granting 11 Bank of America's Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 21 Song Chuan's Motion to Amend the complaint; dismissing Bank of America from this action. Claims against remaining Defendant John Doe are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 3/10/2017.(sshe, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.