Frechette et al v. Smoky Oak Taproom, LLC

Plaintiff: Miranda Frechette and Kelli Hill
Defendant: Smoky Oak Taproom, LLC
Case Number: 2:2016cv03393
Filed: October 14, 2016
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Charleston Office
County: Charleston
Presiding Judge: Patrick Michael Duffy
Referring Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1446
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frechette et al v. Smoky Oak Taproom, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Miranda Frechette
Represented By: Bruce E Miller(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelli Hill
Represented By: Bruce E Miller(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smoky Oak Taproom, LLC
Represented By: Stephanie E Lewis(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Thomas Chase Samples(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?