Jaume-Suarez v. Warden FCI Edgefield
Petitioner: Jason Jaume-Suarez
Respondent: Warden FCI Edgefield
Case Number: 2:2016cv03770
Filed: November 30, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Edgefield
Presiding Judge: Mary Gordon Baker
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER AND OPINION adopting 19 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker; granting 11 Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 8/8/2017.(ssam, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jaume-Suarez v. Warden FCI Edgefield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jason Jaume-Suarez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden FCI Edgefield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?