Stone v. Stirling et al

Petitioner: Bobby Wayne Stone
Respondent: Bryan P Stirling and Joseph McFadden
Case Number: 2:2017cv01221
Filed: May 11, 2017
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Charleston Office
County: Sumter
Referring Judge: Mary Gordon Baker
Presiding Judge: Mary Geiger Lewis
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stone v. Stirling et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Bobby Wayne Stone
Represented By: John H Blume
Represented By: Emily Paavola
Represented By: John LaFitte Warren, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bryan P Stirling
Represented By: Sherrie Ann Butterbaugh
Represented By: Alphonso Simon, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Joseph McFadden
Represented By: Sherrie Ann Butterbaugh
Represented By: Alphonso Simon, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?