Fashaw v. Warden MacDougall Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Marcus M Fashaw
Respondent: Warden MacDougall Correctional Institution
Case Number: 2:2017cv01330
Filed: May 22, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Chesterfield
Presiding Judge: Patrick Michael Duffy
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER RULING ON 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION For the foregoing reasons, the Court overrules Plaintiff's objections to the R&R and adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 10/10/2017. (egra, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fashaw v. Warden MacDougall Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Marcus M Fashaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden MacDougall Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?