Kunda v. Honeywell International Inc
Plaintiff: David M Kunda
Defendant: Honeywell International Inc
Case Number: 2:2017cv03134
Filed: November 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Charleston
Presiding Judge: Mary Gordon Baker
Presiding Judge: Patrick Michael Duffy
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER the Court adopts and incorporates the Magistrate Judge's 27 Report and Recommendation; the Court overrules Plaintiff's 28 Objections; and the Court grants Defendant's 25 motion for summary judgment. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 07/25/2019.(hada, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kunda v. Honeywell International Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David M Kunda
Represented By: Stephen Joseph Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Honeywell International Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?