Battle et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
Korell Battle, Darnell Brown, Jeffery Brown, Ronnie Drake, Lance Lyles, John W Mack and Jabari Moore |
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Cecilia Reynolds and Aaron Joyner |
2:2018cv00719 |
March 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Charleston Office |
Lee |
Mary Gordon Baker |
A Marvin Quattlebaum |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 179 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court affirms the ( 142 in 2:18-cv-00719-TMC-MGB, 135 in 2:19-cv-00572-TMC-MGB, 135 in 2:19-cv-00574-TMC-MGB, 134 in 2:19-cv-00575-TMC-MGB, 136 in 2:19-cv-00576-TMC-MGB) Report and Recommendation as set out. The court DECLINES the Report to the extent it orders SCDC to pay Plaintiffs' reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees, associated with their motions to compel production. The court DECLINES the magistrate judge's recommendation that Defendants be prohibited from introducing certain video or photos into evidence at trial and that the jury be informed of the Defendants' failure to produce these items. The court REMANDS the matter to the magistrate judge for an assessment of reasonable attorneys' fees as a sanction as set forth. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 8/27/20. Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-00719-TMC-MGB, 2:19-cv-00572-TMC-MGB, 2:19-cv-00574-TMC-MGB, 2:19-cv-00575-TMC-MGB, 2:19-cv-00576-TMC-MGB(kmca) |
Filing 139 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 120 of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker (130 in 2:19-cv-00574-TMC-MGB, 129 in 2:19-cv-00575-TMC-MGB, 136 in 2:18-cv-00719-TMC-MGB, 130 in 2:19-cv-00572-TMC-MGB, 131 in 2:19-cv-005 76-TMC-MGB). The court ADOPTS the Report of the magistrate judge and incorporates it herein by reference. The court finds that Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment 106 is MOOT to the extent it seeks summary judgment as to Plaintif fs' § 1983 claims against SCDC. In light of Plaintiffs' notice of withdrawal of all § 1983 claims against SCDC, the court hereby DISMISSES those claims. The court DENIES Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment 106 to the extent Defendants request that the court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims against SCDC. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 12/20/2019. Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-00719-TMC-MGB, 2:19-cv-00572-TMC-MGB, 2:19-cv-00574-TMC-MGB, 2:19-cv-00575-TMC-MGB, 2:19-cv-00576-TMC-MGB(rshu, ) |
Filing 102 ORDER that Defendants shall produce to Plaintiffs' Counsel the entire unredacted Roth Report by Monday June 10, 2019. The Roth Report is considered subject to the Confidentiality Order 39 already in place and is for att orneys' eyes only. In addition, the Court finds that, given that Mr. Roth could be a fact witness in this case, Defendants must disclose to Plaintiffs' counsel Mr. Roth's home address so that he may be served a notice of his deposition . Defendants are directed to disclose this information by Monday, June 10, 2019. This information is also for attorneys' eyes only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 6/7/19. Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-00719-TMC-MGB et al. (rshu, ) |
Filing 81 ORDER adopting in part 57 Report and Recommendation. Defendants' 24 Summary Judgment Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted only as to Plaintiff Jabari Moore's claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Accordingly, Plaintiff Moore's federal claims are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff Moore's remaining state law claims are REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Lee County, South Carolina. Additionally, the court finds that the remaining Plaintiffs' claims should be SEVERED into separate actions. Plaintiff Battle will continue under the instant civil action number. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign new civil action numbers to each of the other individual Plaintiffs. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 02/26/2019.(hada, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.