Hilton v. Stephon

Petitioner: Kenneth Hilton
Respondent: Warden Stephon
Case Number: 2:2018cv00962
Filed: April 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Cherokee
Referring Judge: Mary Gordon Baker
Presiding Judge: Donald C Coggins
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER adopting 22 Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker. The Motion for Summary Judgment 14 is GRANTED and the Petition is dismissed. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 12/13/2018. (hada, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hilton v. Stephon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenneth Hilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Stephon
Represented By: Melody Jane Brown
Represented By: William Edgar Salter, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?