White v. Iseman et al
| Alfred T White |
| Jonathan Chase Iseman, Brandon T Braxton and Clarendon County Sheriff's Office |
| 2:2018cv01043 |
| April 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Charleston Office |
| Clarendon |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Bristow Marchant |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Court ADOPTS the R & R of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 36) as the order of the Court. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 36) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The m otion is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiffs § 1983 claim is DISMISSED. The motion is DENIED to the extent that Plaintiffs remaining state law claims are REMANDED to state court for disposition. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 5/5/20.(ltap, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
