Vanderhorst v. Harris Teeter LLC
Plaintiff: William Vanderhorst
Defendant: Harris Teeter LLC, John Doe 2, Jane Doe 1 and John Doe 3
Case Number: 2:2018cv02182
Filed: August 8, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Charleston
Presiding Judge: Bruce Howe Hendricks
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 5, 2018 Filing 12 Harris Teeter, LLC's ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint by Harris Teeter LLC.(Silverberg, Jeffrey)
August 22, 2018 Filing 11 Summons Issued as to John Doe 3. (vdru, )
August 22, 2018 Filing 10 Summons Issued as to John Doe 2. (vdru, )
August 22, 2018 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Jane Doe 1. (vdru, ) .
August 22, 2018 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Harris Teeter LLC. (vdru, )
August 22, 2018 Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by William Vanderhorst.(Redmond, Mark)
August 22, 2018 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by William Vanderhorst. Service due by 11/20/2018 (Redmond, Mark)
August 8, 2018 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Harris Teeter LLC. (egra, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/9/2018: #1 Certificate of Service) (egra, ).
August 8, 2018 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Harris Teeter LLC. (egra, )
August 8, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2018-cp-10-03369. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-7932125), filed by Harris Teeter LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Documents Affidavits of Service, #3 Exhibit C - Stipulation of Dismissal filed in state court, #4 Certificate of Service) (egra, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vanderhorst v. Harris Teeter LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harris Teeter LLC
Represented By: Jeffrey Ian Silverberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe 2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe 3
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Vanderhorst
Represented By: Mark A Redmond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?