Green v. Agru America Inc
| Michael Green |
| Agru America Inc |
| 2:2018cv02513 |
| September 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Bristow Marchant |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Michael Green.(Wilson, Ralph) |
| Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss and Incorporated Memorandum in Support Response filed by Agru America Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - First Charge, #2 Exhibit B - Second Charge)(Dubberly, David) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss and Incorporated Memorandum in Support Response filed by Michael Green.Reply to Response to Motion due by 10/10/2018 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Right to Sue, #2 Exhibit Notice of Right to Sue, #3 Reconsideration)(Wilson, Ralph) |
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time. Response to Defendant's motion to dismiss due October 5, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 9/25/2018.(elac, )
|
| Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time by Michael Green. Response to Motion due by 10/9/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(Wilson, Ralph) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss and Incorporated Memorandum in Support by Agru America Inc. Response to Motion due by 9/28/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - EEOC Dismissal and Notice of Rights)No proposed order.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(Dubberly, David) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Agru America Inc. (lsut, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Georgetown Court of Common Pleas, case number 2018-CP-22-00658 (filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-7992813), filed by Agru America Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents) (lsut, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Green v. Agru America Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Green | |
| Represented By: | Allison Deborah Gordon |
| Represented By: | Ralph James Wilson, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Agru America Inc | |
| Represented By: | David Eugene Dubberly |
| Represented By: | Michael Patrick Scott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
