Bryant v. United States Department of Interior et al
Anthony G Bryant |
United States Marshal, US Attorney for the District of South Carolina, United States Department of Interior and Attorney General of the United States |
2:2018cv02593 |
September 24, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Gordon Baker |
Margaret B Seymour |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. § 702 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ASSEMBLED INITIAL ELECTRONIC RECORD TRANSMITTED TO FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS re #26 Notice of Appeal, Electronic record successfully transmitted. (cwhi, ) |
Filing 28 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #27 Transmittal Sheet for Notice of Appeal to USCA, placed in U.S. Mail to Anthony G Bryant. (cwhi, ) |
Filing 27 Transmittal Sheet for Notice of Appeal to USCA re #26 Notice of Appeal, The Clerk's Office hereby certifies the record and the docket sheet available through ECF to be the certified list in lieu of the record and/or the certified copy of the docket entries. (cwhi, ) |
Filing 26 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #23 Order on Report and Recommendation,, by Anthony G Bryant. - The Docketing Statement form, Transcript Order form and CJA 24 form may be obtained from the Fourth Circuit website at www.ca4.uscourts.gov (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - City Council Minutes)(cwhi, ) |
Filing 25 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #24 Judgment, #23 Order on Report and Recommendation,, placed in U.S. Mail to Anthony G Bryant (ssam, ) |
Filing 24 JUDGMENT: Plaintiff, Anthony G. Bryant, shall take nothing of Defendants--United States Department of Interior, United States Marshal, Attorney General of the United States--as to the complaint and this action is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is now subject to a pre-filing injunction pursuant to Graham v. Riddle. (ssam, ) Modified to edit text on 10/22/2018 (ssam, ). |
![]() |
Filing 22 OBJECTION to #16 Report and Recommendation by Anthony G Bryant. (ssam, ) |
Filing 21 OBJECTION to #16 Report and Recommendation by Anthony G Bryant. (ssam, ) |
Filing 19 OBJECTION to #16 Report and Recommendation by Anthony G Bryant. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Document)(ssam, ) |
Filing 18 OBJECTION to #16 Report and Recommendation by Anthony G Bryant. (ssam, ) |
Filing 17 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #14 Order, #16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #9 Amended Complaint filed by Anthony G Bryant placed in U.S. Mail to Anthony G Bryant (ssam, ) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 13 OBJECTIONS to Report and Recommendation by Anthony G Bryant. (ssam, ) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Interior, United States Marshal, filed by Anthony G Bryant.(ssam, ) |
Filing 8 OBJECTIONS to Report and Recommendation by Anthony G Bryant. (ssam, ) |
Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #6 Proper Form Order with required documents and blank amended complaint form placed in U.S. Mail to Anthony G Bryant (ssam, ) |
![]() |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Anthony G Bryant. Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(ssam, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/1/2018: #1 IFP Motion) (ssam, ). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Attorney General of the United States, US Attorney for the District of South Carolina, United States Department of Interior, United States Marshal, filed by Anthony G Bryant. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents)(ssam, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.