Marchant v. Maxim Healthcare Services Inc
| Crystal Marchant |
| Maxim Healthcare Services Inc |
| 2:2018cv02757 |
| October 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT that having granted Defendant Maxim Healthcare Services Inc's Motion, ordering Plaintiff Crystal Marchant and Defendant to arbitration, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (sshe, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER AND OPINION granting #4 Defendant Maxim Healthcare Services Inc's Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff Crystal Marchant and Defendant Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. to arbitrate their dispute in accordance with the Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate. All claims against Defendant Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 11/5/2018.(sshe, )
|
| Filing 6 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by Maxim Healthcare Services Inc. (Eckard, Michael) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by Crystal Marchant.Reply to Response to Motion due by 10/31/2018 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Wigger, Jarrel) |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Maxim Healthcare Services Inc. Response to Motion due by 10/24/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit Memorandum Ex. A - Declaration of Amy Holland,, #3 Exhibit Memorandum Ex. B - 9-27-18 Lt. to Opposing Counsel, #4 Exhibit Memorandum Ex. C - Court's 9-29-14 Order re: Sansbury)No proposed order.(sshe, ) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Maxim Healthcare Services Inc.(sshe, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2018-CP-10-03749. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8046645), filed by Maxim Healthcare Services Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Amy Holland)(sshe, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marchant v. Maxim Healthcare Services Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Crystal Marchant | |
| Represented By: | Jarrel L Wigger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Maxim Healthcare Services Inc | |
| Represented By: | Michelle Elsey McMahon |
| Represented By: | Michael Oliver Eckard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
