Williams v. LM Communications of SC Inc
| Daniel S Williams |
| LM Communications of SC Inc |
| 2:2018cv02814 |
| October 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Bristow Marchant |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 626 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by LM Communications of SC Inc. (Quisenberry, Brian) |
Filing 11
CONSENT AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 3/20/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 4/22/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 5/22/2019, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 5/22/2019, Discovery due by 7/22/2019, Motions due by 9/19/2019, Mediation Due by 8/20/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 12/03/2018. (egra, )
|
| Filing 10 Joint Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by LM Communications of SC Inc.(Quisenberry, Brian) |
| Filing 9 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by LM Communications of SC Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Quisenberry, Brian) |
| Filing 8 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Daniel S Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Witness List)(Hunt, Bonnie) |
| Filing 7 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by LM Communications of SC Inc.(Quisenberry, Brian) |
|
Filing 6
CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 11/15/2018, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 11/29/2018, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 12/20/2018, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 1/21/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 2/21/2019, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 2/21/2019, Discovery due by 4/22/2019, Motions due by 6/21/2019, Mediation Due by 5/22/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 10/25/2018. (egra, )
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by LM Communications of SC Inc.(Quisenberry, Brian) |
| Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Daniel S Williams.(Hunt, Bonnie) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by LM Communications of SC Inc. (egra, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2018-cp-10-3003. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8059631), filed by LM Communications of SC Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C - Certificate of Service) (egra, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. LM Communications of SC Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel S Williams | |
| Represented By: | Bonnie Travaglio Hunt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LM Communications of SC Inc | |
| Represented By: | Brian Quisenberry |
| Represented By: | Stephanie N Ramia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
