Goguen v. Greystar Real Estate Partners LLC et al
| Sandra Goguen |
| CCC Mount Pleasant LLC and Greystar Real Estate Partners LLC |
| 2:2018cv02906 |
| October 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by CCC Mount Pleasant LLC, Greystar Real Estate Partners LLC.(Yount, Adam) |
| Filing 7 Defendants' ANSWER to #1 Complaint by CCC Mount Pleasant LLC, Greystar Real Estate Partners LLC.(Yount, Adam) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sandra Goguen. Greystar Real Estate Partners LLC served on 11/1/2018, answer due 11/26/2018. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Service)(Smoot, Benjamin) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sandra Goguen. CCC Mount Pleasant LLC served on 11/1/2018, answer due 11/26/2018. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Service)(Smoot, Benjamin) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (jbry, ) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Sandra Goguen.(jbry, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8075448.), filed by Sandra Goguen. Service due by 1/24/2019(jbry, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
