Weinreich v. Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc et al
Plaintiff: Gary Weinreich
Defendant: Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc and Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America Inc
Case Number: 2:2018cv03294
Filed: December 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ORDER granting #5 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Toyota Motor Corporation answer due 3/1/2019; Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America Inc answer due 3/1/2019; Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc answer due 3/1/2019. Entered at the Direction of Honorable Richard M Gergel on 1/8/2019.(sshe, )
January 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America Inc, Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc. Response to Motion due by 1/22/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Smith, Joel) (Main Document 5 replaced on 1/9/2019) (sshe, ). Modified on 1/9/2019 to replace with corrected signature document as provided by filing user(sshe, ).
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (sshe, )
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Gary Weinreich.(sshe, )
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8146775.), filed by Gary Weinreich. Service due by 3/6/2019(sshe, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weinreich v. Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toyota Motor Corporation
Represented By: Ashleigh Rayanna Wilson
Represented By: Joel Haywood Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc
Represented By: Ashleigh Rayanna Wilson
Represented By: Joel Haywood Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America Inc
Represented By: Ashleigh Rayanna Wilson
Represented By: Joel Haywood Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary Weinreich
Represented By: Gabrielle Anna Sulpizio
Represented By: James Edward Bell, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?