Republic Services Inc v. Chapel of the Holy Spirit
| Republic Services Inc |
| Chapel of the Holy Spirit |
| 2:2018cv03307 |
| December 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ***DOCUMENT E-MAILED #9 Order on Motion to Stay to Berkeley County Small Claims South, ***DOCUMENT MAILED #9 Order on Motion to Stay placed in U.S. Mail to Berkeley County Small Claims South (jbry, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Cancellation of Hearing: on Motion #5 MOTION to Stay : Motion Hearing set for Friday, 1/25/2019 at 10:30 AM (jbry, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER denying #5 Motion to Stay and remanding case. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 1/22/2019.(jbry, )
|
| Filing 8 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Stay Response filed by Republic Services Inc. (Jordan, Robert) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Hearing on Motion #5 MOTION to Stay : Motion Hearing set for Friday, 1/25/2019 at 10:30 AM in Hon. Sol Blatt, Jr., Courtroom, J. Waties Waring Judicial Cntr, 83 Meeting St, Charleston before Honorable David C Norton. (jbry, ) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Stay Response filed by Chapel of the Holy Spirit.Reply to Response to Motion due by 1/10/2019 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Drescher, David) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Stay by Republic Services Inc. Response to Motion due by 1/4/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Jackson)No proposed order.(Jordan, Robert) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Berkeley County Magistrate Court County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Acknowledgment of Receipt of Notice of Removal)(Jordan, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Republic Services Inc.(jbry, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Berkeley County Magistrate Court, case number 2018CV0810701288. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8148564), filed by Republic Services Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Magistrate Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Scott H. Russeth)(jbry, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Republic Services Inc v. Chapel of the Holy Spirit | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Republic Services Inc | |
| Represented By: | Robert H Jordan |
| Represented By: | Thomas H Brush |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chapel of the Holy Spirit | |
| Represented By: | Curtis Elliott Bostic |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
