Sigmon v. Bridgestone Americas Inc et al
Ted Sigmon |
Bridgestone Americas Inc and Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC |
2:2018cv03324 |
December 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
David C Norton |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 2/22/2019, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 3/7/2019, Rule 26 Report due by 3/7/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/4/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 5/6/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 6/7/2019, Discovery due by 10/4/2019, Motions in Limine due at least three weeks prior to jury selection, Motions due by 10/16/2019, Jury Selection Deadline 12/1/2019, ADR Statement due by 10/31/2019, Mediation Due by 11/30/2019, Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 2/4/2019. (jbry, ) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting #14 Motion by Jonathan D. Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 1/31/2019.(jbry, ) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Motion by Benjamin J. Sweet to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 1/30/2019.(jbry, ) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Benjamin J. Sweet ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0420-8237740) by Ted Sigmon. Response to Motion due by 2/12/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit for Pro Hac Vice Admission)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Ward, James) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jonathan D. Miller ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0420-8237734) by Ted Sigmon. Response to Motion due by 2/12/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit for Pro Hac Vice Admission)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Ward, James) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/31/2019) (jbry, ). Modified on 1/31/2019 to replace with corrected document provided by filing user (jbry, ). |
Filing 13 Amended ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC.(Cox, David) |
Filing 12 Amended ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Bridgestone Americas Inc.(Cox, David) |
Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC.(Cox, David) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC.(Cox, David) |
Filing 8 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Bridgestone Americas Inc.(Cox, David) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Bridgestone Americas Inc.(Cox, David) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ted Sigmon. Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC served on 12/13/2018, answer due 1/3/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Proof of Service)(Ward, James) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ted Sigmon. Bridgestone Americas Inc served on 12/13/2018, answer due 1/3/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Proof of Service)(Ward, James) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (jbry, ) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Ted Sigmon.(jbry, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8151217.), filed by Ted Sigmon. Service due by 3/11/2019(jbry, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.