Harley v. North American Transportation Services LLC et al
| Devin Thomas Harley |
| Premium Transportation Staffing Inc, Premium Transportation Group Inc, Premium Enterprises Inc, Marvin Morales, Todd T Packard, Premium of Tennessee Inc and North American Transportation Services LLC |
| 2:2019cv00029 |
| January 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Todd T Packard, Premium Enterprises Inc, Premium Transportation Group Inc, Premium Transportation Staffing Inc, Premium of Tennessee Inc.(jbry, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Colleton County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2018-CP-15-01002. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8189504), filed by Premium Transportation Group Inc, Premium Enterprises Inc, Todd T Packard, Premium Transportation Staffing Inc, Premium of Tennessee Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - NATS Cert of Status, #3 Exhibit C - PTG Cert of Status, #4 Exhibit D - Premium Enterprises Cert of Status, #5 Exhibit E - Premium Trans Staffing Cert of Status, #6 Exhibit F - Premium of TN Cert of Status, #7 Exhibit G - Consents To Removal)(jbry, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
