Sweat v. Brian Sterling et al
Jeremy Shay Sweat and Jeremy Sweat |
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Michael McCall and Brian Sterling |
2:2019cv00307 |
February 4, 2019 |
U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Gordon Baker |
J Michelle Childs |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #15 Proper Form Order with required documents, placed in U.S. Mail to Jeremy Shay Sweat. (hada, ) |
![]() |
Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Brian Sterling, Michael McCall, filed by Jeremy Shay Sweat. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope) (hada, ) |
Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 8 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #7 Proper Form Order with required documents, placed in U.S. Mail to Jeremy Shay Sweat. (hada, ) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 6 Partial Filing fee: $ 20.10, receipt number SCX300080121. (hada, ) |
Filing 4 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Greenwood. (hada, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Jeremy Shay Sweat. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope) Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker. (hada, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against South Carolina Department of Corrections, filed by Jeremy Shay Sweat. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope) (hada, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.