Fleury v. Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc
Paul Fleury |
Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc and Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC |
2:2019cv00379 |
February 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Request for Protection from Court Appearance by William A Bryan, Jr for 4/5/19-4/8/19; 5/9/19-5/22/19 (Bryan, William) |
Filing 9 Summons Reissued as to Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC. (sshe, ) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued re #4 as to Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC. (sshe, ) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #4 Amended Complaint , CROSSCLAIM against Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC by Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc.(Bryan, William) |
Filing 5 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Paul Fleury.(Gentry, John) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc, filed by Paul Fleury. Service due by 5/13/2019 (Gentry, John) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc.(sshe, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2018-CP-10-05386. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8260463), filed by Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(sshe, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.