Eckemoff v. AmerCareRoyal LLC
| Maximillian Eckemoff |
| AmerCareRoyal LLC |
| 2:2019cv00438 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. It is ordered that Mitchell A. Robinson who represents AmerCareRoyal, LLC is granted admission pro hac vice in this case. Entered at the Direction of The Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 3/20/2019.(vdru, ) |
| Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. It is ordered that Todd D. Wozniak who represents AmerCareRoyal, LLC is granted admission pro hac vice in this case. Entered at the Direction of The Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 3/20/2019.(vdru, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Mitchell A. Robinson ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0420-8332988) by AmerCareRoyal LLC. Response to Motion due by 4/2/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents Application for Pro Hac Admission)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Cooke, Morris) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Todd D. Wozniak ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0420-8332957) by AmerCareRoyal LLC. Response to Motion due by 4/2/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents Application for Pro Hac Admission)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Cooke, Morris) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE by AmerCareRoyal LLC. AmerCareRoyal LLC waiver executed on 3/4/2019, answer due 5/3/2019. (Cooke, Morris) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to AmerCareRoyal LLC. (vdru, ) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Maximillian Eckemoff.(vdru, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AmerCareRoyal LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8270535.), filed by Maximillian Eckemoff. Service due by 5/15/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: You Are Set Text, #2 Exhibit B: It Would Be Retro Text, #3 Exhibit C: No Such Thing Text, #4 Exhibit D: Mazzei Linked In Screenshot)(vdru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Eckemoff v. AmerCareRoyal LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AmerCareRoyal LLC | |
| Represented By: | Todd David Wozniak |
| Represented By: | Morris Dawes Cooke, Jr |
| Represented By: | Mitchell A Robinson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Maximillian Eckemoff | |
| Represented By: | Molly Hamilton Cawley |
| Represented By: | Casey Merrell Martens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
