Meyer v. Anderson et al
| Parker Meyer |
| Jeffrey Anderson and Jeff Anderson & Associates PA |
| 2:2019cv00640 |
| March 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION for More Definite Statement Response filed by Jeffrey Anderson, Jeff Anderson & Associates PA. (Outten, Samuel)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED HEARING on Motions #8 MOTION for More Definite Statement, #5 MOTION to Deposit Funds : Motion Hearing set for Tuesday, 4/30/2019 at 11:00 AM cancelled and rescheduled to: Motion Hearing set for Tuesday, 5/14/2019 at 11:00 AM in Hon. Sol Blatt, Jr., Courtroom, J. Waties Waring Judicial Cntr, 83 Meeting St, Charleston before Honorable David C Norton. (jbry, )
|
|
Filing 14
RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION for More Definite Statement Response filed by Parker Meyer.Reply to Response to Motion due by 4/12/2019 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Meyers, Gregg)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Hearing on Motions #8 MOTION for More Definite Statement , #5 MOTION to Deposit Funds : Motion Hearing set for Tuesday, 4/30/2019 at 11:00 AM in Hon. Sol Blatt, Jr., Courtroom, J. Waties Waring Judicial Cntr, 83 Meeting St, Charleston before Honorable David C Norton. (jbry, )
|
|
Filing 12
REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Deposit Funds Response filed by Parker Meyer. (Meyers, Gregg)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion by Barry M. Landy to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 3/26/2019.(jbry, )
|
|
Filing 10
Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Jeffrey Anderson, Jeff Anderson & Associates PA.(Outten, Samuel)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Barry M. Landy ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0420-8343638) by Jeffrey Anderson, Jeff Anderson & Associates PA. Response to Motion due by 4/8/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Application/Affidavit for Pro Hac Vice Admission for Barry M. Landy)No proposed order.(Outten, Samuel)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for More Definite Statement by Jeffrey Anderson, Jeff Anderson & Associates PA. Response to Motion due by 4/5/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Outten, Samuel)
|
|
Filing 6
RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Deposit Funds Response filed by Jeffrey Anderson, Jeff Anderson & Associates PA.Reply to Response to Motion due by 3/26/2019 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Outten, Samuel)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Deposit Funds by Parker Meyer. Response to Motion due by 3/19/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)No proposed order.(jbry, )
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (jbry, )
|
|
Filing 2
Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Parker Meyer.(jbry, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8305078.), filed by Parker Meyer. Service due by 6/3/2019 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Michael J. Virzi)(jbry, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
