Deleon v. Kolter Group, LLC, The et al
| Deborah Deleon |
| KH Ponds, LLLP and Kolter Group, LLC, The |
| 2:2019cv01449 |
| May 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Bristow Marchant |
| David C Norton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Stay re #1 Notice of Removal and Compel Arbitration by KH Ponds, LLLP, Kolter Group, LLC, The. Response to Motion due by 6/3/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Ryan Mosher)No proposed order.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(Lambert, William) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by William Grayson Lambert on behalf of KH Ponds, LLLP, Kolter Group, LLC, The (Lambert, William) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard J Morgan on behalf of KH Ponds, LLLP, Kolter Group, LLC, The (Morgan, Richard) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by KH Ponds, LLLP, Kolter Group, LLC, The. (egra, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Dorchester County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2019-cp-18-00643. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8451734), filed by KH Ponds, LLLP, Kolter Group, LLC, The. (egra, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
