Main Street America Assurance Company v. Orellana Stucco Contractor LLC et al
Main Street America Assurance Company |
Alfonzo Omar Reyes Orellana, Orellano Stucco LLC and Orellana Stucco Contractor LLC |
2:2019cv01906 |
July 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Returned Unexecuted (Restricted Access) by Main Street America Assurance Company as to Alfonzo Omar Reyes Orellana. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of non-service)(Tonnsen, Eric) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Alfonzo Omar Reyes Orellana, Orellana Stucco Contractor LLC, Orellano Stucco LLC, filed by Main Street America Assurance Company. Service due by 10/23/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Policy, #2 Exhibit Second Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit First Exteriors Ans to 2nd Amnd Comp) (Tonnsen, Eric) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (sshe, ) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Main Street America Assurance Company.(sshe, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8539809.), filed by Main Street America Assurance Company. Service due by 10/1/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Policy, #2 Exhibit B Amended Answer and Third-Party Complaint)(sshe, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.