Cox v. Bishop England High School et al
Elizabeth Cox |
Patrick Finneran, Bishop England High School and Unknown Defendants |
2:2019cv02202 |
August 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
David C Norton |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ***DOCUMENT E-MAILED #20 Order on Motion to Remand to Leah Guerry Dupree, ***DOCUMENT MAILED #20 Order on Motion to Remand placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Leah Guerry Dupree (jbry, ) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Remand Signed by Honorable David C Norton on September 17, 2019.(cdan, ) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Cancellation of Hearing: Motion to Remand, 9/19/2019 at 10:00 am (eric, ) |
Filing 18 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION to Remand Response filed by Elizabeth Cox. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit BEHS v. Hudson Summons & Complaint)(Smith, Thomas) |
Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Response filed by Bishop England High School, Patrick Finneran.Reply to Response to Motion due by 9/3/2019 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Cleveland, Caroline) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Remand Response filed by Bishop England High School, Patrick Finneran.Reply to Response to Motion due by 9/3/2019 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 Cox Criminal Complaint)(Cleveland, Caroline) |
Filing 15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendants Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint by Bishop England High School, Patrick Finneran. Response to Motion due fourteen (14) days from the date of the order on #7 Motion to remand, if it is denied. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Cleveland, Caroline) Modified on 8/27/2019 to edit response due date (jbry, ). |
Filing 14 TEXT ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Bishop England High School answer due 8/26/2019; Patrick Finneran answer due 8/26/2019. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 8/26/2019.(eric, ) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #6 Amended Complaint, Response filed by Elizabeth Cox.Reply to Response to Motion due by 9/3/2019 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Smith, Thomas) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #6 Amended Complaint, by Bishop England High School, Patrick Finneran. Response to Motion due by 9/6/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Defendants Bishop England High School and Finneran's Motion to Dismiss)No proposed order.(Cleveland, Caroline) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Default Judgment as to by Elizabeth Cox. Response to Motion due by 9/6/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Affidavit of Service)No proposed order.(Smith, Thomas) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 Motion to Stay. If plaintiff's motion to remand is denied, she shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of the order to file a response to defendants' motion to dismiss. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 8/15/2019.(jbry, ) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Hearing on Motion #7 MOTION to Remand : Motion Hearing set for Thursday, 9/19/2019 at 10:00 AM in Hon. Sol Blatt, Jr., Courtroom, J. Waties Waring Judicial Cntr, 83 Meeting St, Charleston before Honorable David C Norton. (jbry, ) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Stay by Elizabeth Cox. Response to Motion due by 8/27/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Smith, Thomas) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Remand by Elizabeth Cox. Response to Motion due by 8/27/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)No proposed order.(Smith, Thomas) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Elizabeth Cox. Service due by 11/6/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-3 2018-2019 Employment Contract, Discharge Letter, 2019-2020 Employment Contract) (Smith, Thomas) Modified on 8/8/2019 to add description to exhibit (jbry, ). |
Filing 5 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Elizabeth Cox.(Smith, Thomas) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM ( Response to Motion due by 8/20/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. ) by Bishop England High School, Patrick Finneran. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)No proposed order.(jbry, ) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Bishop England High School, Patrick Finneran.(jbry, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Berkeley County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2019-CP-08-01720. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8599156), filed by Patrick Finneran, Bishop England High School. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Summons and Complaint)(jbry, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.