McClelland v. United Parcel Service Co et al
| Bryan G McClelland |
| United Parcel Service Co and UPS Ground Freight Inc |
| 2:2019cv02568 |
| September 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1337 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by UPS Ground Freight Inc, United Parcel Service Co. (Bogdan, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by UPS Ground Freight Inc, United Parcel Service Co.(Bogdan, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by United Parcel Service Co. (Bogdan, Jeffrey) (Main Document 4 replaced on 9/12/2019) (jbry, ). Modified on 9/12/2019 to correct case number on document as verified and supplied by filing user(jbry, ). |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by UPS Ground Freight Inc, United Parcel Service Co.(jbry, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2019-CP-10-04202. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8664065), filed by United Parcel Service Co, UPS Ground Freight Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Filings 20227358, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Filings 20227407)(jbry, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
