Wade v. Charleston Oncology PA
| Jacquetta Wade |
| Charleston Oncology PA |
| 2:2019cv03024 |
| October 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Kaymani D West |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Charleston Oncology PA.(Crites, J) |
| Filing 10 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Charleston Oncology PA.(Crites, J) |
| Filing 9 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Jacquetta Wade.(Bloodgood, Nancy) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Charleston County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Acknowledgment of Removal)(Crites, J) |
| Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Jacquetta Wade.(Bloodgood, Nancy) |
| Filing 5 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 11/21/2019, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 12/5/2019, Rule 26 Report due by 12/5/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 1/29/2020, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 2/28/2020, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 3/30/2020, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 4/6/2020, Discovery due by 4/28/2020, Motions due by 5/12/2020. Motions in limine must be filed no later than fifteen (15) business days prior to jury selection. No later than twenty-one (21) business days prior to jury selection, the parties shall file and exchange Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) pretrial disclosures. Parties shall furnish the Court and serve pretrial briefs five (5) business days prior to the date set for jury selection. This case is subject to being called for jury selection and/or trial on or after August 1, 2020. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 10/31/2019. (prou, ) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Charleston Oncology PA. (Crites, J) Modified on 10/30/2019 to correct event type. (prou, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories with jury demand by Charleston Oncology PA.(prou, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Common Pleas, case number 2019-CP-10-4798. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8742021), filed by Charleston Oncology PA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents)(prou, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wade v. Charleston Oncology PA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jacquetta Wade | |
| Represented By: | Lucy Clark Sanders |
| Represented By: | Nancy Bloodgood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Charleston Oncology PA | |
| Represented By: | J Bennett Crites, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
