Grant-Davis v. Mikell et al
Plaintiff: King Grant-Davis
Defendant: Jason Mikell, Charleston, City of, Stephen Harris and Judge Bently Price
Case Number: 2:2019cv03119
Filed: November 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Referring Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2019 Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bently Price, filed by King Grant-Davis. Service due by 3/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, )
November 14, 2019 Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #12 Proper Form Order w/NEF and Complaint Form for a Civil Case, 13 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to King Grant-Davis, 3210-A Meeting Street, North Charleston, SC, 29405 (dsto, )
November 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis per #12 Proper Form Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/14/2019.(dsto)
November 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 12/5/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/14/2019. (dsto, )
November 13, 2019 Filing 10 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER Entry #6 Reason: to move to Entry #1 per chambers. (dsto, )
November 1, 2019 Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by King Grant-Davis.(dsto, )
November 1, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by King Grant-Davis. Response to Motion due by 11/15/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grant-Davis v. Mikell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason Mikell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charleston, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judge Bently Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: King Grant-Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?