Benefitfocus.com Inc v. Mitch et al
Benefitfocus.com Inc |
Ryan Mitch and Plansource Benefits Administration Inc |
2:2019cv03201 |
November 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
David C Norton |
Contract: Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint,, All Defendants shall have until January 13, 2020 to file their response pleadings to plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 1/7/2020.(jbry, ) |
Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Plansource Benefits Administration Inc. Response to Motion due by 1/21/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Quisenberry, Brian) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall have until January 6, 2020 to file a responsive pleading to plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 1/6/2020.(jbry, ) |
Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time for Second Extension of Time for Defendants to File Their Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint by Plansource Benefits Administration Inc. Response to Motion due by 1/10/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Quisenberry, Brian) |
Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting protection from court appearances to Brian L. Quisenberry for 12/9-16/2019. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 12/5/2019. (eric, ) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Request for Protection from Court Appearance by Brian Quisenberry for December 9, 2019, through and including December 16, 2019 (Quisenberry, Brian) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall haveuntil December 27, 2019 to answer or otherwise plead to plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 12/2/2019.(jbry, ) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendants to File Their Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint by Plansource Benefits Administration Inc. Response to Motion due by 12/16/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Quisenberry, Brian) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Benefitfocus.com Inc. Plansource Benefits Administration Inc served on 11/15/2019, answer due 12/6/2019. (Dunlap, Jennifer) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Benefitfocus.com Inc. Ryan Mitch served on 11/12/2019, answer due 12/3/2019. (Dunlap, Jennifer) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ryan Mitch, Plansource Benefits Administration Inc. (jbry, ) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Benefitfocus.com Inc.(jbry, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ryan Mitch, Plansource Benefits Administration Inc ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8771243.), filed by Benefitfocus.com Inc. Service due by 2/10/2020 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Employment Agreement with Ryan Mitch, #2 Exhibit B - 10-21-19 Letter to Ryan Mitch, #3 Exhibit C - 10-21-19 Letter to PlanSource)(jbry, ) (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/12/2019) (jbry, ). Modified on 11/12/2019 to replace incorrect document with corrected document as provided by filing user (jbry, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.