Vennings v. Whitten
| Earl Vennings, Jr |
| Beatrice Whitten |
| 2:2020cv00003 |
| January 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Gordon Baker |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 13 Order, #8 Proper Form Order with required documents, 9 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Earl Vennings, Jr 1900 Hazelwood Drive Apt H4 Charleston, SC 29407 (hada, ) |
| Filing 13 TEXT ORDER On January 30, 2020, the Clerk mailed Plaintiff a copy of an order that the Court issued that day. The copy has been returned as undeliverable. However, Plaintiff's recent filings in another pending case show that Plaintiff is still using the address the Clerk of Court used for mailing the January 30 order. Therefore, the Clerk of Court is directed to mail another copy of the January 30 order, as well as a copy of this order, to Plaintiff at the address he has provided the Court. The deadlines in the January 30 order are hereby extended to February 28, 2020. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 02/19/2020. (hada, ) |
| Filing 12 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Addressee: Earl Vennings, Jr.. Document Returned: #8 Proper Form Order, 9 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (hada, ) |
| Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #8 Proper Form Order with required documents, 9 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Earl Vennings, Jr 1900 Hazelwood Drive Apt H4 Charleston, SC 29407 (hada, ) |
Filing 9
REFERENCE ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 01/30/2020.(hada, )
|
|
Filing 8
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 2/19/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 01/30/2020. (hada, )
|
| Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Earl Vennings, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hada, ) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Earl Vennings, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hada, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Earl Vennings, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(hada, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Beatrice Whitten, filed by Earl Vennings, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hada, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vennings v. Whitten | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Beatrice Whitten | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Earl Vennings, Jr | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
