Breyan v. State of South Carolina
Plaintiff: Michael Anthony Breyan
Defendant: State of South Carolina
Case Number: 2:2020cv00186
Filed: January 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Mary Gordon Baker
Referring Judge: Bruce Howe Hendricks
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2020 Filing 26 Letter from Michael Anthony Breyan. Note: Clerk's Office updated address in ECF this date. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hada, )
March 9, 2020 Filing 25 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #24 Judgment, #23 Order Dismissing Case, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Michael Anthony Breyan 332098 Lieber Correctional Institution P.O. Box 205 Ridgeville, SC 29472 (hada, )
March 9, 2020 Filing 24 JUDGMENT: Plaintiff, Michael Anthony Breyan, shall take nothing of Defendant, State of South Carolina, and each employer that played a part in violation of my federal rights holding me illegally, not counting each incident that happened while in illegal confinement and that harm I was caused while being in illegal confinement, as to the complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 and this action is dismissed without prejudice. (hada, )
March 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case and failed to comply with a court order. The Court therefore dismisses this case without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 03/09/2020. (hada, )
February 27, 2020 Filing 22 Letter from Michael Anthony Breyan. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2Supporting Documents (3) Supporting Documents (4) Envelope)(hada, )
February 24, 2020 Filing 21 Letter from Michael Anthony Breyan. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(hada, )
February 10, 2020 Filing 19 SUPPLEMENT by Michael Anthony Breyan. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(hada, )
February 5, 2020 Filing 17 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #16 Proper Form Order with required documents, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Michael Anthony Breyan 332098 Lieber Correctional Institution P.O. Box 205 Ridgeville, SC 29472 (hada, )
February 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 2/26/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 02/05/2020. (hada, )
February 3, 2020 Filing 15 Letter from Michael Anthony Breyan. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(hada, )
January 29, 2020 Filing 14 SUPPLEMENT by Michael Anthony Breyan to #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(hada, )
January 22, 2020 Filing 11 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #10 Case Transferred In - District Transfer placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Michael Anthony Breyan 332098 Lieber Correctional Institution P.O. Box 205 Ridgeville, SC 29472 (egra, )
January 22, 2020 Filing 10 Case transferred in from District of California Southern; Case Number 3:19-cv-02023. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
January 17, 2020 Filing 9 Case transferred to District of South Carolina District Court. Files transferred electronically to: *District of South Carolina District Court*.*901 Richland Street**Columbia, SC 29201*. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 1/17/2020. (Attachments: #1 transfer order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/22/2020.]
January 13, 2020 Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against State of South Carolina, filed by Michael Anthony Breyan. (jms) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/22/2020.]
January 6, 2020 Filing 7 Request for Verdict by Michael Anthony Breyan. Nunc Pro Tunc 12/23/2019 (jms) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/22/2020.]
January 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Janis L. Sammartino Accepting Document: Request for Verdict, from Plaintiff Michael Anthony Breyan. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation, Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document, OTHER: Complaint submitted for initial screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Nunc Pro Tunc 12/23/2019. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 1/6/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/22/2020.]
November 25, 2019 Filing 5 Second Set of Miscellaneous Exhibits in Support of Complaint [ECF No. #1 ] by Michael Anthony Breyan. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/22/2019(jms) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/22/2020.]
November 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Janis L. Sammartino Accepting Document: Second Set of Miscellaneous Exhibits in Support of Complaint [ECF No. #1 ], from Plaintiff Michael Anthony Breyan. Non-compliance with local rule(s) CivLR 5.1.e : [E]xhibits must be attached to the documents to which they belong and must be readable without detaching the exhibit from the the accompanying document. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/22/2019. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 11/25/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/22/2020.]
November 19, 2019 Filing 3 Exhibits in Support of Complaint [ECF No. #1 ] by Michael Anthony Breyan.Nunc Pro Tunc 11/18/2019.(jms) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/22/2020.]
November 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Janis L. Sammartino Accepting Document: Exhibits in Support of Complaint [ECF No. #1 ], from Plaintiff Michael Anthony Breyan. Non-compliance with local rule(s): CivLR 5.1.e : [E]xhibits must be attached to the documents to which they belong and must be readable without detaching the exhibit from the the accompanying document. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/18/2019. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 11/19/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/22/2020.]
October 21, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State of South Carolina, filed by Michael Anthony Breyan.($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-2023-JLS-BLM. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/22/2020.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Breyan v. State of South Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Anthony Breyan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of South Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?