Barr v. Medical University of South Carolina
Melissa Barr |
Medical University of South Carolina |
2:2020cv01137 |
March 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
Thomas E Rogers |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Medical University of South Carolina. Response to Motion due by 5/20/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(Conley, Bob) |
Filing 6 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by Melissa Barr. Medical University of South Carolina served on 3/26/2020, answer due 4/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Acceptance of Service)(Dukes, Lorene) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Medical University of South Carolina. Service due by 6/23/2020. (dsto, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories with jury demand by Melissa Barr.(dsto, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Medical University of South Carolina (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-9013908), filed by Melissa Barr. Service due by 6/18/2020.(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.