Washington v. The Boeing Company
Plaintiff: Joel Washington
Defendant: The Boeing Company
Case Number: 2:2020cv01144
Filed: March 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Referring Judge: Bristow Marchant
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Partial) by The Boeing Company. Response to Motion due by 6/2/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - EEO Policy)No proposed order.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(Blackburn, Cherie)
May 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against The Boeing Company, filed by Joel Washington. Service due by 8/3/2020 (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Gist, Donald)
April 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 TEXT ORDER. The deadline for paying the filing fee and an Amended Complaint, if desired, has expired. See Court Docket No. 1, p. 4 n. 4, p. 5 n. 5. Plaintiff has ten (10) days to pay the filing fee or the case will be recommended to be dismissed. If the Plaintiff pays the filing fee and desires to file an Amended Complaint, it should also be filed within ten (10) days. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 4/29/2020. (elac, )
March 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against The Boeing Company, filed by Joel Washington. Service due by 6/22/2020(cpeg, )
March 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER- Accordingly, as the Complaint fails to comply with Rule 20 of the Fed.R.Civ.P. concerning joinder of claims and parties, IT IS ORDERED that these cases be severed. See Rule 20(a), Fed.R.Civ.P. With regard to Defendant's pending motion to dismiss 5, that motion is moot based upon the Court's ruling herein. After each Plaintiff files their Amended Complaint setting forth separate factual allegations as to their claims, the Defendant may file an appropriate motion at that time based on the allegations in those Amended Complaints, if it still desires to do so. Further details set forth in Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 03/24/2020. (cpeg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Washington v. The Boeing Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Boeing Company
Represented By: Christina Landsdowne Rogers
Represented By: Cherie Wilson Blackburn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joel Washington
Represented By: Aaron Vernon Wallace
Represented By: Donald Gist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?