Woodley v. iQor et al
Cheryl Woodley |
iQor and Courtney King |
2:2020cv01273 |
April 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Gordon Baker |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 REPLY by Cheryl Woodley to #8 Proper Form Order. (hada, ) |
Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #8 Proper Form Order with required documents, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Cheryl Woodley, 7891 #104 Dove Creek Road, Charleston, SC 29418. (hada, ) |
Filing 8 PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 4/29/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 04/08/2020. (hada, ) |
Filing 5 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Cheryl Woodley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hada, ) |
Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Cheryl Woodley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hada, ) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service by Cheryl Woodley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hada, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Cheryl Woodley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(hada, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Courtney King, iQor, filed by Cheryl Woodley. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(hada, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.