Charleston Advancement Academy High School v. Acceleration Academies LLC
| Charleston Advancement Academy High School |
| Acceleration Academies LLC |
| 2:2020cv01676 |
| April 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Acceleration Academies LLC.(jbry, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020-CP-10-01762. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-9075901), filed by Acceleration Academies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of David Sundstrom, #2 State Court Documents M for TRO, #3 State Court Documents Summons, #4 State Court Documents Complaint, #5 State Court Documents PHV App, #6 State Court Documents amended PHV, #7 State Court Documents Order denying M for TRO, #8 State Court Documents Affidavit of David Sundstrom, #9 State Court Documents M for PHV, #10 State Court Documents Cert of Service M for PHV, #11 State Court Documents Order granting PHV-Durham, #12 State Court Documents Judgment, #13 State Court Documents Order granting PHV -Flynn, #14 State Court Documents Proposed Order, #15 State Court Documents Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(jbry, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
