Atanassova et al v. General Motors LLC
Case Number: 2:2020cv01728
Filed: February 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 274 ORDER AND OPINION: The Court GRANTS Defendant's motion for limited adjustments to the scheduling order in advance of retrial. (Dkt. No. 269). Defendant shall make the BUC and exemplar Silverado with aftermarket dual exh aust immediately available for Plaintiffs' inspection. Plaintiffs' counsel would be well advised to promptly arrange for proper inspections of the proposed demonstrative exhibits. The Court will address the use of the demonstrative exhibits at trial if Plaintiffs assert objections following their inspections.AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 7/11/23.(ltap, ) Modified document type on 7/12/2023 (sshe, ).
March 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 194 ORDER AND OPINION denying 146 Defendant's Motion for Sanctions. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 3/30/23.(ltap, ) Modified Document type on 3/31/2023 (cper, ).
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 192 ORDER AND OPINION: The Court DENIES Defendant's motion in limine No. 5 for adverse inferences based on spoliation of the 2007 Silverado (Dkt. No. 153).AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 3/28/23.(ltap, ) Modified document type on 3/29/2023 (sshe, ).
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER AND OPINION: Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 45) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' (a) manufacturing defect and (b) failure to warn claims. The mo tion is otherwise DENIED. Defendant's motion to exclude the testimony of Mr. Stephen R. Syson (Dkt. No. 40) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is granted only to the extent that Syson (a) may not testify as to an alleged failure t o warn on Defendant's part and (b) may not explicitly testify that Defendant's actions constitute negligence or gross negligence. The motion is otherwise DENIED. Defendant's motion to exclude the testimony of Dr. Lila Laux (Dkt. No. 41 ) is GRANTED. And Defendant's motions to exclude the testimonies of Drs. Steven A. Kahn and Kenneth Boudreaux (Dkt. Nos. 42, 44) are DENIED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 2/22/21.(ltap, ) Modified to edit document, docket text to correct link as to Dkt. No. 42 on 2/22/2021 (sshe, ). (Main Document 87 replaced on 2/22/2021) (sshe, ).
February 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER AND OPINION The Court GRANTS Defendant's motion to compel (Dkt. No. 50 ). As detailed in the Order, Plaintiffs are DIRECTED to produce all documents responsive to Defendant's RFP Request Nos. 12, 13, 19 and 22 within ten (10) days of this Order. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 2/12/2021.(sshe, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Atanassova et al v. General Motors LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?