Hooper v. Phelps et al
| Steven Lee Hooper |
| Bureau of Prisons, The, Dr. Deborah G Schult, Dr. Walton P Battle, Dr. Sawyer Hawk, Warden S. Phelps and Hugh J Hurwitz |
| 2:2020cv02078 |
| June 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Gordon Baker |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Steven Lee Hooper. Response to Motion due by 8/7/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(hada, ) |
| Filing 5 Letter from Steven Hooper. Note: Clerk's Office mailed a copy of public docket to Steven Lee Hooper, 18139-030, Edgefield Federal Correctional Institution, PO Box 725, Edgefield, SC 29824. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hada, ) |
| Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Greenwood. (hada, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Steven Lee Hooper. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(hada, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Walton P Battle, Bureau of Prisons, The, Sawyer Hawk, Hugh J Hurwitz, S. Phelps, Deborah G Schult, filed by Steven Lee Hooper. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(hada, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
