Mallwitz v. Mack et al
Jonathan B Mallwitz |
Scarlet Wilson, Det D.J. Pritchard, Benjamin Andrew Mack and Jordan Smith |
2:2020cv02220 |
June 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Bristow Marchant |
David C Norton |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #16 Judgment, #15 Order on Report and Recommendation placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Jonathan B Mallwitz 1588398 Charleston County Detention Center 3841 Leeds Avenue North Charleston, SC 29405 (jbry, ) |
Filing 16 JUDGMENT in favor of Benjamin Andrew Mack, D.J. Pritchard, Jordan Smith, Scarlet Wilson against Jonathan B Mallwitz (jbry, ) |
Filing 15 ORDER affirming #11 Report and Recommendation, dismissing complaint without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 7/29/2020.(eric, ) |
Filing 14 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Addressee: Jonathan Mallwitz. Document Returned: 10 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #9 Order - 1983 - No Service, #11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Jonathan B Mallwitz (cpeg, ) |
Filing 13 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Addressee: Jonathan B Mallwitz. Document Returned: 8 Document Mailed (cpeg, ) |
Filing 12 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 10 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #9 Order - 1983 - No Service, #11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Jonathan B Mallwitz placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Jonathan B Mallwitz 1588398 Charleston County Detention Center 3841 Leeds Avenue North Charleston, SC 29405 (cpeg, ) |
Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Jonathan B Mallwitz. It is recommended that the Court dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 7/28/2020 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 07/14/2020. (cpeg, ) |
Filing 10 REFERENCE #9 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 07/14/2020.(cpeg, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350.00 Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 07/14/2020. (cpeg, ) |
Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT MAILED Clerk Notes Case Assign Public placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Jonathan B. Mallwitz 1588398 Charleston County Detention Center 3841 Leeds Ave North Charleston, SC 29405 (sshe, ) |
Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry. Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant no longer assigned to the case. (swil, ) |
Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Charleston. (cpeg, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Jonathan B Mallwitz. Response to Motion due by 6/24/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(cpeg, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Benjamin Andrew Mack, D.J. Pritchard, Jordan Smith, Scarlet Wilson, filed by Jonathan B Mallwitz. Service due by 9/8/2020 (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cpeg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.